Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:11394 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
W PMS/ 3 5 2 5 / 2 0 2 5 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.
Mr. S.K. Mandal, Advocate for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent nos. 1 to 5.
3. According to the petitioner he has made a complaint against respondent no. 6 that she supplied forged educational certificates in her nomination papers and on the strength of such forged certificates, she got elected as pradhan.
4. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite having made the complaint in the month of September, 2025, no decision is being taken.
5. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief: -
“i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent/ Prescribed Authority to decide the complaint of the petitioner dated 10.09.2025 (received on 11.09.2025) expeditiously as possible as earlier, within the definite span of time, (contained in Annexure No. 5 to the writ petition).”
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Prescribed Authority to look into the issue raised by the petitioner in his complaint and take decision, as per law, within six months.
( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.)
19.12.2025 Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb 4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653 D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2025.12.19 18:25:23 +05'30'