IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18384 of 2017 ====================================================== 1. Kapil Kushwaha @ Kapil Mahto 2. Bhulayi Kushwaha S/o Late Mahanth Kushwaha Both Resident of Vill- Manjhariya Tola Situhiya, P.S. Piparasi, Block-Piparasi Bagaha Dist. West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Dist. Magistrate Cum Collector, Dist. West Champaran 3. The Deputy Collector of Land Reforms, Bagaha, Dist.-West Champaran 4. The Circle Officer, Revenue Circle Piparasi, Block Piparasi, Dist.-West Champaran. 5. Ramakant Kushwaha S/o Late Satan Kushwaha 6. Ramkishun Kushwaha S/o Late Satan Kushwaha 7. Ramprit Kushwaha S/o Late Satan Kushwaha Respondents No. 5 to 7 are Resident of Village-Manjhariya Tola Situhiya, P.S. Piparasi, Block-Piparasi Bagaha Dist. West Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, SC-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 23-06-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners. However, learned counsel for the State is present. 2. This writ petition is filed on behalf of petitioners for the following reliefs:- (i) For a direction against the Respondents to remove the encroachment and ensure the possession of the petitioners over land bearing Khata No. 2 Kheshra No. 2756/1, having an area of 1 Acre 10 decimals along with kheshra no. 3255/274 having an area of 45 decimals (total area of 1 acre and 55 decimals) Patna High Court CWJC No.18384 of 2017(2) dt.23-06-2025 2/2 situated in mauja Semara Labedaha under Block Piparasi, Bagaha, West Champaran, in compliance of order dated 07/01/2013 passed by Learned Deputy Collector, Land reforms, Bagaha, West Champran passed in Bihar Land dispute redressal case no. 27/2011-2012, which has already been confirmed by the court of Learned Commissioner. Tirhut at Muzzafarpur by order dated 02.03.2015 in B.L.D.R. appeal case no. 510/2013, which is settled land of the petitioners and the private Respondents, inspite of the order from the competent Authorities/courts are disturbing the possession of the petitioner defying the courts order made in the favour of the petitioners. (ii) For any other relief/relief's may be granted in favour of the petitioners for which he is found entitled in facts and circumstances of the case. 3. For want of prosecution, this writ petition is dismissed. priyanka/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U