MD. ALAM ANSARI ALIAS MONU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5519/2025 · 2025-07-08
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16564 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16564 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:18313] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5519 of 2025
------ Md. Alam Ansari @ Monu aged about 30 yrs., S/o Abul Kalam, R/o Village Buddiyakhad, P.O. and P.S. Giridih (M) .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Tarun Kumar No.1, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Prafull Jojo, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-08-07-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Giridih(T) P.S. Case No.108 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 74, 78, 308(3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 8, 12 of POCSO Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner outraged the modesty of the informant and caused sexual harassment and sexual assault upon the minor victim girl. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.04.2025 as is evident from para-11 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not go to the Giridih Town Police Station area during the trial of the case, except for appearing in the court. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-
(Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, POCSO Act-cum-District Judge- VIII, Giridih in connection with Giridih(T) P.S. Case No.108 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case and he will not go to the Giridih Town Police Station area during the trial of the case, except for appearing in the court.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/