NISHAR AHMAD @ NISHAR ALI AND 2 OTHERS v. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. RAEBARELI AND 5 OTHERS
A227/5831/2025 · 2025-09-24
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165637 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165637 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5831 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. By means of the instant petition, the petitioners seek a direction for trial court to expedite his application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC filed on 19.05.2025 in Suit no.383 of 2025. Considering the aforesaid submissions and from a perusal of the record, there is no accentuating circumstances which may persuade this Court to entertain the petition or pass any expedite order at this stage. Accordingly, this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition. The petition is dismissed leaving it open for the petitioner to move an application before the court concerned. Needless to say that in case if such an application is moved the court concerned shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. It is made clear that in case, if any cause for expedition arises in future relating to unnecessary delay in the disposal of the application, this order may not come in the way of the petitioners. September 24, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Kanaujia Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Jaspreet Singh,J.) Nishar Ahmad @ Nishar Ali And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Civil Judge J.D. Raebareli And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench