Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16563 (RAJ)

SUNIL KUMAR @ CHINTU @ CM S/O SHRI RAMPRATAP MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5444/2025 · 2025-05-16

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:20798] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5444/2025 Sunil Kumar @ Chintu @ Cm S/o Shri Rampratap Meena, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Ghatwadi, Police Station Raisar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan (Accused Presently Confined In Sub Jail Kotputali) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mamraj Jat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 16/05/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0089/2025 registered at Police Station-Manoharpur, District-Jaipur Rural for the offences under Sections 8, 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that recovered contraband is below the commercial quantity. There is only one case pending against the petitioner but that too was registered just two days before the present FIR, that incident was related to below commercial quantity of contraband recovered from the conscious possession of the co-accused and in which he [2025:RJ-JP:20798] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5444/2025] has been implicated only on the basis of statement of co-accused. The petitioner is behind the Bar since 05.04.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Sunil Kumar @ Chintu @ Cm S/o Shri Rampratap Meena shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/213