IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18279 of 2017 ====================================================== Sudama Kumar Son of Mangal Chand Prasad, Resident of Village-Bakraur, P.S.-Bodgaya Dist.-Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Gaya. 3. Additional Collector, Gaya. 4. Land reform Deputy Collector, Sadar, Gaya. 5. The Circle Officer, Bodhgaya, Gaya 6. Sharda Ranjan Son of Hare Krishna Prasad, Resident of Village-Bakraur, P.S.-Bodgaya Dist.-Gaya. 7. Priya Ranjan Son of Hare Krishna Prasad, Resident of Village-Bakraur, P.S.- Bodgaya Dist.-Gaya. 8. Bhushan Chaudhary, Son of late Shyam Chaudhary Resident of Village- Ratnara Ganga Bigha, P.S. Bodhgaya, Gaya. 9. Goswami Narsinghgiri Chela Satanand giri, Resident of Village-Bodhgaya Math, P.S.-Bodhgaya, Dist.-Gaya. 10. Kesho Manjhi 11. Vijay Manjhi @ Bijli Manjhi 12. Phulchand Manjhi 10 to 12 are Sons of Vishun Manjhi, Resident of Village- Bakraur, P.S.-Bodgaya Dist.-Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bibhuti Narayan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 23-06-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “(i) For quashing the order dated 05.10.2017 passed in Jamabandi cancellation case no. Patna High Court CWJC No.18279 of 2017(2) dt.23-06-2025 2/3 01/2014-15. Passed by respondent no.03 whereby and where under Jamabandi No. 200/5 appertaining to Khata no. 02, khesra no. 150, 155, 153, area 0.47, 0.25, 0.45, jamabandi no. 97/III appertaining to Khata no. 445, khesra no. 146, area 0.375 and jamabandi no. 22/II appertaining to Khata no. 201 khesra no. 147 area 0.24 situated in Maouja Bakraur. Thana no. 358 within Bodhgaya Anchal have been canceled. (ii) For grant of stay of the order impugned and its consequential actions during pendency of the writ petition. (iii) Any other relief/reliefs which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. Learned State counsel at the outset submits that against the Jamabandi Cancellation order dated 05.10.2017 in Jamabandi Cancellation Case No. 01 of 2014-15, the petitioner shall should have taken step for challenging the same and filing an appeal before the concerned Collector. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he Patna High Court CWJC No.18279 of 2017(2) dt.23-06-2025 3/3 shall be approaching the office but he has lost eight years by preferring writ petition. 5. If the petitioner approaches the concerned authority in next four weeks, the authority shall taken into account the pendency of the writ petition while dealing with the limitation petition. 6. The writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U