HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9192 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. The instructions handed over across the Bar by learned Standing Counsel are taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel. 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners stating that despite there being no fault of the petitioners, they are being denied from the benefit of training in terms of their rights mainly on the ground that respondent No.6 has not afforded the documents within the time as prescribed. 4. Reliance is placed on the similar order passed by this Court in the case of Soni Verma and others Vs. Union of India and others; Writ-C No.3075 of 2024 as well as the judgement of this Court in Writ-C No.23175 of 2024 (Gayatri Gautam and others Vs. State of U.P. and others) decided on 04.09.2024. 5. Considering the fact that the issue raised in the present writ petition is similar to one decided by this Court, the present petition is also disposed of on the same terms and conditions with the directions to respondent No.3 to upload the names of the petitioners on its portal on or before 22.09.2025. 6. Consequently, upon the uploading, the petitioners would also be permitted to undergo the training, in accordance with law. September 16, 2025 Haseen U. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Savitra Vardhan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Priyanka Devi And 28 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench