Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165619 (ALL)

SYED MINHAJ HAIDER AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/8023/2025 · 2025-09-19

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8023 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard. Learned Counsel for the applicants states that on account of some formal defects in the pleadings, he does not want to press the present application and liberty may be granted to the applicants to file a fresh with proper pleadings and documents in support thereof. To the aforesaid prayer, learned AGA has no objection. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed with liberty as aforesaid. Office is directed to return back all the certified copies of order and documents, annexed in the present application, to the learned Counsel for the applicants, if he applies for the and submit the copies of same. September 19, 2025 Jyoti/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shashank Singh, Ruby Choudhary Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Syed Minhaj Haider And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench