Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165617 (ALL)

POONAM CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/8878/2025 · 2025-09-26

Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8878 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard Sri Amar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing at some length, submits that he does not want to press this petition, therefore, the same may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail remedy of anticipatory bail / bail. To which, there is no objection by learned A.G.A. 3. In view of above, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. September 26, 2025 Saurabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Poonam Chaudhary .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench