[2025:RJ-JP:11894] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12343/2016 1. Prahalad Balai son of Ramnarayan Balai age 44 years, village Nimora Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 2. Madan lal Jangid son of Kajodmal Jangid age 44 years, village Nimora Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 3. Kamlesh jangid son of Babulal Jangid age 32 years, village Nimora Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Chief Secretary, Secretariat Janpath, Jaipur. 2. State of Rajasthan, department of Revenue, through Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Rajasthan state Mining Department through Mining Engineer, Jaipur. 4. District collector, Jaipur. 5. Tehsildar, Bassi, District Jaipur. 6. Surendra Lal Son of Nageen Das Shah, Resident of 1 Ka 15, Jawahar Nagar, Sector No. 1, Jaipur. 7. Babu Lal Sharma, S/O Sua Lal Village Banskho Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 8. Savitri Devi W/O Babu Lal Sharma Village Banskho Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 9. Deendayal Sharma S/O Sua Lal Village Banskho Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 10. Arvind Kumar Sharma S/O Sua Lal Village Banskho Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 11. Rajanti Devi W/O Deendayal Sharma Village Banskho Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 12. Suman Devi W/O Arvind Kumar Sharma Village Banskho, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 13. Sharad Bothra S/O Champalal Bothra, Prithviraj Road, C- Scheme Jaipur. 14. Sugandha Patni W/O Arpit Patni, Vivekanand Marg, C- Scheme Jaipur. 15. Abha Patni W/O Arun Patni, Vivekanand Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:11894] (2 of 2) [CW-12343/2016] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohan Agarwal for Mr. Rajat Ranjan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vaibhav Kasliwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 17/03/2025 1. An application (1/2024) has been filed by and on behalf of respondent No.13, making a prayer to dispose of the instant writ petition in the light of the judgment dated 11.01.2018 passed by Additional District Collector-I, Jaipur, District Jaipur making a reference in exercises of powers under Section 82 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 in respect of the land of Khasra No.67/20 measuring 15 bigha recorded as Gair Mumkin Pahad but was mutated in the name of private Khatedar. 2. It appears that petitioners preferred instant writ petition on 31.08.2016 fundamentally raising a similar grievance and seeking direction against the State Government to make a reference of the subject land under Section 82 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 so that the land in nature of Gair Mumkin Pahad may be maintained. 3. Thus, it is apparent that the grievance raised by the petitioners stands satisfied on making a reference by the ADC of the subject land vide judgment dated 11.01.2018 and no order in that respect is required to be passed by this Court. 4. In view of above, the proceedings of instant writ petition are hereby closed. 5. Interim stay order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J TN/93