HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11022 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard Dr. Amrendra Nath Tripathi, Advocate assisted by Sri Vijay Nandan Mani Tripathi, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Balbir Singh, Advocate, who has filed memo of appearance on behalf of the respondent No.1 in Court today, which is taken on record, and Sri Sharad Kumar Shukla, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents No.2 to 6. 2. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. 3. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 09.08.2025, a copy of which is annexure-1 to the petition, whereby he has been transferred from the Zonal Office, Lakhimpur Kheri to the Digital Banking Division, Corporate Office, Chennai and has also been relieved. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner has raised various grounds to challenge the impugned transfer order, however the Court is of the view that the said grounds fall in the realm of the grounds to be considered by the respondents at the first instance. 5. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation against the impugned transfer order dated 09.08.2025 before respondent No.3 within a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amrendra Nath Tripathi, Ranjeet Kumar Pal Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Sharad Kumar Shukla Ankit Dixit (Employee Id - 769636) .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Mini. Of Finance Deptt. Of Finance Ser. New Delhi And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) period of one week from today. 6. In case such a representation is made, respondent No.3 shall proceed to decide the same in accordance with law considering the grounds taken by the petitioner in the representation, which would be decided within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with copy of this order. 7. Till disposal of representation, no coercive action shall be taken by the respondents against the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned transfer order. 8. It is made clear that if the petitioner does not submit his representation within the time specified, then the benefit of this order shall not be available to him. September 18, 2025 cks/- WRIA No. 11022 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench