Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165599 (ALL)

NIRMAN SAHKARI AVAS SAMITI LTD. THRU. SECRETARY SHRI PRADEEP AGARWAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING LKO. AND ANOTHER

WRIC/9238/2025 · 2025-09-22

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9238 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. This petition has been filed with the following prayers :- "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to provide a certified copy of the amended bye-laws dated 23.09.1986 of Nirman Sahkari Avas Samiti Limited, Lucknow (Registration No.1001/1985) within a time period of 30 days." It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is a registered society under the provisions of Cooperative Societies Act, 1965. Bye- laws of the petitioner society were amended on 23.9.1986 which expressly permitted ordinary members from the general public to be inducted into the society and the bye- laws were approved and registered by respondent no.2. A copy of the amended bye-laws was provided to the petitioner?s society at the time of registration of the amendments to the bye-laws which were subsequently lost during the movement of the documents from the registered office of the society to the office of the Chartered Accountant, near Gulachin Mandir, Aliganj, Lucknow. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner has repeatedly requested respondent no.2 in writing to provide a copy of the amended byelaws but the respondent no.2 did not provide the same, hence, present writ petition. In view of the aforesaid submissions we direct the respondent no.2 to provide a certified copy of the amended byelaws dated 23.9.1986 of Nirman Sahkari Awas Limited, Lucknow, registration no.1001 of 1985 within two months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced in case it is permissible under law. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Agrawal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary Nirman Sahkari Avas Samiti Ltd. Thru. Secretary Shri Pradeep Agarwal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Housing And Urban Planning Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) In case the copies as demanded by the petitioner, if it cannot be provided then the reasons have to be recorded by the respondent no.2 and will be communicated to the petitioner. On the oral prayer of the petitioner he is permitted to make correction in the array of the parties. With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. September 22, 2025 mks WRIC No. 9238 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench