- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21425 RFA No. 1205 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1205 OF 2018 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT KALKERE VILLAGE, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560 043. 2. 2(a) SMT. VENKATAMMA W/O LATE NAGAPPA, DEAD BY LR'S, SRINIVAS S/O VENKATAMMA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 2(b) ANJANAMUTHY S/O VENKATAMMA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, BOTH R/AT NO.175, KALKERE VILLAGE, HORAMAVU POST, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560 043. 3. SMT. MUNIYAMMA W/O LATE SUBBARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, KALKERE VILLAGE, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21425 RFA No. 1205 of 2018 BENGALURU-560 043. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. KRISHNA NAIK & SRI. SUDARSHAN KUMAR.G.N., ADVOCATES [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SRI. MUNIVENKATAPPA, S/O LATE CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, 2. 2(a) SRI. RAJAPPA S/O LATE CHIKKANNA, SINCE DEAD BY LR'S, NARAYANAMMA W/O LATE RAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 2(b) NAGESH S/O LATE RAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 2(c) RAJA S/O LATE RAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, 3. SMT. PUTTAMMA W/O LATE POOJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 4. SRI.GOVINDA @ GOWDA S/O LATE POOJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 5. KUM. SHILPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, D/O LATE POOJAPPA, 6. SMT. MUNIRATHNA D/O LATE POOJAPPA, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21425 RFA No. 1205 of 2018 AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT ANANTHAPURA VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, CHIKKABETTAHALLI POST, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-560 064. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 1 UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellants are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 16.06.2025, on that day, when the case was called, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. Hence, it was ordered to be listed on 20.06.2025 under the caption ‘for dismissal'. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal'. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellants are not represented. It appears that the appellants - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21425 RFA No. 1205 of 2018 are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36