BALO ALIAS IQUBAL KURAISHI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4879/2025 · 2025-06-19
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16558 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16558 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:16184]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4879 of 2025
Balo @Iqubal Kuraishi aged about 53 yrs, son of Late Md. Safik, resident of Village - Line Muhalla, Khankah Road, P.O. - Chatra, P.S.Sadar, District - Chatra.
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sushant Kr. Sinha , Adv. For the State
: Mr. P.D.Agrawal, Spl.PP.
02 / 19.06.2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chatra Sadar P.S. Case No. 146 of 2025 registered under Sections 317(5), 3(5) of BNS and also U/s- 11 of Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960 and also under Sections 5/12 of Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition & Slaughter Act, 2005.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in selling of bovine flesh after slaughtering them illegally. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 13 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 28.04.2025, as mentioned in para 11 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co- operate with the trial of the case. It is next submitted that the co-accused with similar allegations has already been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this court vide
order dated 05.06.2025 passed in B.A. No. 4695 of 2025, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Chatra in connection with Chatra Sadar P.S. Case No. 146 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-