[2025:RJ-JP:7795] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 621/2018 Vinod Kumar Diwatch Son of Sh. Maliram Diwatch, aged 27 years, R/o Village Heera Nagar, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana District Sikar Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj, Govt. of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bikaner. 3. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Nokha, District Bikaner. 4. Govt. Primary School Beeramsar Choraha, Khinchiyasar, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner Through Head M ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prateek Saxsena Mr. Ashotosh Udawat for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 20/02/2025 1. By way of filing of the instant writ petition, a prayer has been made by the petitioner for issuing directions to the respondents to pay him the due arrears for the post of Teacher Grade-III for the period wherein, he remained posted at Government Upper Primary School, Godawali Deepawas, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar. 2. It appears that with regard to the same prayer, the petitioner has earlier also approached this Court by way of filing S.B. Civil [2025:RJ-JP:7795] (2 of 3) [CW-621/2018] Writ Petition No.18395/2017 and the said petition was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 14.10.2017 granting him liberty to file representation before the respondent-State and the respondent-State was further directed to decide the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 3. Perusal of the entire writ petition indicates that no representation has been annexed by the petitioner, which was given to the respondents in terms of the order dated 14.10.2017. Till date, there is no clarity, whether any representation was submitted by the petitioner before the respondents, pursuant to the order dated 14.10.2017. Even no averment has been made in this regard in the writ petition. 4. Hence, under such circumstances, the instant writ petition stands disposed of by reiterating the same direction issued by this Court, on earlier occasion. The petitioner may file a detailed comprehensive representation before the respondents with regard to redressal of his grievances within a period one month from today. In case, such representation is submitted by him before the respondents within the above stipulated time, it is expected from the respondents to decide the same, expeditiously, as early as possible, preferably within a period of two months thereafter, by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 5. Stay application as well as all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 6. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not passed any direction/order to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular manner. The [2025:RJ-JP:7795] (3 of 3) [CW-621/2018] respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 7. Let a copy of this order be sent at the residential address of the petitioner as mentioned in the array of cause title, for his information, intimation and compliance. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J GARIMA /28