Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165528 (ALL)

AMLENDR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. MINISTRY OF HOME LKO.

NABAIL/1330/2025 · 2025-09-22

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1330 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Crime Number: 216/2025, Under Sections 281, 105 BNS, P.S.: Krishna Nagar, Lucknow. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. In the prosecution case, it is alleged that on 02.05.2025 at about 10:00 p.m., while the informant’s son, Akarsh Verma, was returning home on his motorcycle bearing registration No. UP32-HM-2494, another motorcycle bearing registration No. UP32-HW-1343, being driven at a high speed, hit him near Shakti Power House Chauraha, LDA. Eye-witnesses stated that two persons were performing stunts and driving rashly, which resulted in the death of the informant’s son. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent, has been falsely implicated, and has no criminal antecedents. It is further submitted that the police are making attempts to arrest him. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. On due consideration of the admitted incident, the facts that both the applicant and the deceased sustained injuries, and the deceased succumbed Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Akash Kumar Yadav, Ashish Chaurasia, Manoj Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amlendr .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Ministry Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) to death during treatment, having suffered five antemortem injuries, with the cause of death being coma due to antemortem head injury, it cannot be said that this is a case of false implication or that the applicant has been implicated merely to tarnish his reputation. 7. Accordingly, no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. The anticipatory bail application is rejected. September 22, 2025 R.C. NABAIL No. 1330 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench