Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165513 (MAD)

Sivakami v. The State of Tamilnadu

CRL OP(MD)/20950/2024 · 2025-03-26

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20950 of 2024 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :26.03.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Crl.O.P.(MD) No.20950 of 2024 Sivakami ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2. The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 3. Karthikeyan ...Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner and her family members in the guise of enquiry based on the false complaint given by the 3rd respondent by considering the petitioner's representation dated 22.11.2024. For Petitioner : Mr. A.Arputharaj For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R3 : Mr.R.Velmurugan 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20950 of 2024 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner and her family members in the guise of enquiry based on the false complaint given by the 3rd respondent by considering the petitioner's representation dated 22.11.2024. 2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents no.1 and 2 would submit that based on the complaint given by the 3rd respondent, they called the petitioner for enquiry. Apart from that, they have not harassed the petitioner. However, the main complaint itself was closed and therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication. 3. Since the prayer of the petitioner is to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner and the 2nd respondent has also denied the alleged harassment, and they called the petitioner for enquiry based on the complaint given by the 3rd respondent, the main petition itself was closed, nothing survives for further adjudication. In view of the same, this criminal original petition is closed. 26.03.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20950 of 2024 To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2. The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20950 of 2024 P. DHANABAL , J. Mac Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20950 of 2024 26.03.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis