1 2025:CGHC:16646 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2412 of 2025 1 - Amit Dubey S/o Late Keshav Dubey Aged About 34 Years Woking As Assistant Gr. Ii And Posted At - District Trade And Industries Center (Zila Vyapar Udhyog Kendra) Korba District- Korba (C.G.), Presently R/o. R.G.09, P.W.D. Colony, Rampur, District- Korba (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Commerce And Industries, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Police Station - Rakhi, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate Industries, Udhyog Bhawan, Ring Road No. 01, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The General Manager District Trade And Industries Center, Korba District- Korba (C.G.) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.04.09 23:49:20 +0530 2 4 - The General Manager District Trade And Industries Center, Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri- Bharatpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Shri Saumitra Keshwarwani, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 09.04.2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner, is questioning the transfer order dated 16.01.2025 (Annexure P-1) by which the petitioner has been transferred from District Office Trade & Industries Center, Korba to District Office, Trade & Indusries Center Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been transferred from Korba to Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur which is about 116 kms away as he is unmarried son of his parents and his father had died and he is the only caretaker of his old aged mother who is of 64 years of age, therefore he prays for quashment of order dated 16.01.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents/ State on instructions submits that, as far as, the transfer of employees of the State 3 government is concerned, the State government has decided to constitute a committee to consider the grievance of the employees in case of transfer and placed a copy of the order dated 03.03.2025. He further submits that if the petitioner will approach the said committee, the committee will decide the same in accordance with the relevant transfer policy and relevant law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and the documents on record. 5. Hence, looking to the grievance of the petitioner, it is directed that the petitioner shall approach the committee constituted by order dated 03.03.2025 with a representation within a period of 10 days from the today. In case of filing of the representation, the said committee shall decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law and the policy within a period of 20 days from the date of filing of the representation. It is made clear that till the period of 30 days from today, the impugned transfer order dated 16.01.2025, so far it relates to the petitioner, shall remain stayed. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. 7. The petitioner is at liberty to apprise the committee about the order of this court. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib