Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
== IN THE .HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Between :
THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAY, of TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE , / HONOURABLE Dk#iPuRsETfCEEN7:. LAKSHMANA RAO u,I CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4718 OF 2025 uof€ L_ ,-- D Ranganadham, S/o. D Anikaiah, Aged 55 years, R/o. Desuru Agafi Harijanawada, Nagari MandaI, Chittoor District (A1 ) ~
2. D Narasimulu, S/o. D Ranganadham, Aged 28 years, R/o. Desuru Agaram Harijanawada, Nagari Mandal, Chittoor District (A3) gr \VA"
3. D Papaiah, S/o. D Ankaiah, Aged 45 years, R/o. Desuru Agaram HariJ'anaWada, Nagari Mandal, Chittoor District (A4) ~ ¢
4. D Saibaba Sai, S/o. D Papaiah, Aged 23years, R/o. Desuru Agarani Harijanawada, Nagari MandaI, Chittoor District (A5) u# V
5. D Seshadri, S/o. D Papaiah, Aged 21 years, R/o. Desuru Agaram Harijanawada, Nagari Mandal, Chittoor District (A6) of I-/ .I.Petitioners/ , Accused No.1 and 3 to 6 'tfat AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Station House Officer, Nagari Ofirfban p.ggrchittoor District, through Public Prosecutor, High Court BIdgs,Amaravat t<` € -~~-,ft ..JRespondent/Complainant Petition under Section 480 & 483 of BNSS (old Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C), praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioners / Accused No. 1 and 3 to 6 on bail in Crime _. -`S .-jrf,>, No.198/2024 of Nagari Urban Police Station, Chittoor District'for the offences under See. 329(3),115 (2),118(1 ) , 351 (2) R/w. Section 3(5) of BNS of Nagari Urban Police Station. of Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri T Janardhan Raotef` Counsel for the Respondent : Assistant Public Prosecutor.
of The Court made the following ORDER:
EasgggE5B_ APHCO10220872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4718/2025 Between : D Ranganadham, and Others AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1.T JANARDHAN RAO [3521] ..|PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the`Respondent/complainant:
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity [the BNSS), seeking to enlarge the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 3 to 6 on bail in Cr.No.198 of 2024 of Nagari Urban Police Station, Chi{toor District registered against the petitioners/Accused herein for the offences punishable under SectionsEi9( 3r 115(2),118(1), 351(2) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity cthe BNS'). .jJZz2, E!-== E=
\_|
2. The case of the prosecution, in a nutshell, is that on 14.12.2024, while the complainant's brother-in-Iaw was leveling a house site, the accused, along with Accused No, 7, quarreled with him, assaulted him with sticks, and caused injuries. Again, on 15.12.2024, the accused assaulted the complainant with sticks and stones. In that incident, the complainant's wife, father, and mother- in-law susta]'ned severe l|njuries. Hence, the complainant lodged a complaint. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. perused the record. 4. Sri T.Janardhan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the pe{itjoners were falsely implicated by the police in the aforemen{]'oned crime owing a civil dispute between the complainant and the accused. The injuries alleged to have been caused to the victims are not grievous in nature; the petitioners would abide by any conditions imposed by this court. Hence, urged {o allow the petition. 5.
Per confra, sri Neelotphal Gunj, the learned Assistant public prosecutor, opposed in granting of bail stating that the injuries sustained by the victims are grave in nature and some more material witnesses have to be examined; investigation is not completed; if the petitioners are enlarged on bailJ they WOu!d not be available for the investigation and they would escape from the clutches of law; and urged to dismiss the bail petition. 6. As seen from the record, the petitioners have been in the judicial custody from the past 76 days, The petitioners are residents of Desuru i= E cZZ I
3 a fat Agaram Harijanawada, Nagari Mandal, Chittoor District of Anclhra Pradesh. lf the petitioners are enlarged on bail with stringent conditions, they would not flee away from the clutches of the law, and interest of the justice would be served. 7. Keeping in view of the period of detention undergone by the petitioners in judicial custody for more than 76 days, the nature and gravity of allegations leveled against the pe{i{ioners, and their alleged role in the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail with the stringent conditions. 8. In the result, the criminal petition is allowed with the following conditions: i) The petitioners shall be enlarged on bail subject to the executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nagari. ii) The petitioners shall appear before the Station House Officer, Nagari Urban Police Station, Chittoor D'lstrict, on every Saturday in between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till cognizance is taken by the learned Trial Court. iii) The petitioners shall not leave the limits of the District without prior permission from the learned Judicial Magistrate of First class, Nagari. I
(th iv) The petitioners shall not commit or indulge in commission of any offence in future.
v) The petitioners shall coopera-te with the investigating officer in further investigation of the case and shall make themselves available for interrogation by the investigating officer as and when required. vi) The petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. SD/-M. PRABHAKAR RAO //TRUE COPY// !zE..'ii#oi a ToI. 1. The Judicial Magistrate of First class, Nagari.of ISTRAR Lu D= u LL LL
2. The Superintendent, District Jail, Chittoor. trfst
3. The Station House Officer, Nagari Urban Police Station, Chittoor District. b¢#~ \,-
4. One CC to Sri T Janardhbeap3apRao, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor (AP) High Courtof Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 6' One spare copy tr>uturf CVSS i iE
HIGH COURT Dr.YLR,J DATED: 15/05/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.4718 of 2025 ALLOWED