AMIT KUMAR TIWARI AND 2 OTHERS v. ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (AYODHYA PRAKARAN) LKO AND 2 OTHERS
A483/782/2025 · 2025-09-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165508 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165508 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 782 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
Order on C.M. Application No.IA/1/2025 (Application for exemption)
1. Heard on the application for exemption.
2. The cause shown in the affidavit filed in support of the application for exemption is sufficient.
3. Accordingly, the application for exemption is allowed and applicant is hereby exempted from filing the entire certified copy of the order-sheet for the reasons given in the affidavit.
Order on application U/S 483
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant application under Section 483 Cr.P.C./ 529 BNSS has been filed with the following prayer:-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to direct to the concerned court for expeditious and proper disposal of trial of Criminal Case No. 1737 of 2014, viz. State vs. Amit Kumar Tripathi and others arising out of Case Crime No.505/2013 U/S- 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station- Thakurganj, District- Lucknow Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jyoti Prakash Mishra, Chandra Chood Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amit Kumar Tiwari And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Ayodhya Prakaran) Lko And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
expeditiously, in the interest of law and justice."
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the matter is still pending
consideration since 2020 and the applicant is suffering hard for delay in conclusion of the trial proceedings. He urges that the interest of justice would be subserved if this Hon'ble Court is pleased enough to direct the Court below to conclude the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1737 of 2014, viz. State vs. Amit Kumar Tripathi and others arising out of Case Crime No.505/2013 U/S- 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station- Thakurganj, District- Lucknow, within a stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court.
4. The counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the contention aforesaid.
5. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, the Trial Court is hereby directed to conclude the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1737 of 2014, viz. State vs. Amit Kumar Tripathi and others arising out of Case Crime No.505/2013 U/S- 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station- Thakurganj, District- Lucknow, in expedition, if there is no legal impediment, while considering the guidelines and circulars issued time to time in this regard.
6. The application is disposed off accordingly.
September 19, 2025 V. Sinha A483 No. 782 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench