RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/8010/2025 · 2025-09-23
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165486 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165486 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8010 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Sri Dinesh Kumar, Advocate has put in appearance by filing Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 and the same is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State, Sri Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the record. By means of the instant application, the applicants have prayed for quashing of the charge sheet no. 01 dated 02/04/2021 arising out of Case Crime No.385 of 2019, u/s 147, 452, 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C., Police Station-Thakurganj, District Lucknow pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate V Lucknow, as contained in Annexure No. 3 to this petition.
Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that due to some misunderstanding the instant FIR was lodged and thereafter, the parties sat together and they have settled their dispute and that too, has been reduced in writing as a compromise deed dated
30.07.2025. Adding his arguments, he submits that now the parties have put their all disputes at rest by way of executing compromise deed and thus further criminal proceedings against the present applicants would be a futile exercise and amount to harassment of the applicants. Adding his arguments, he also submits that this Hon'ble Court vide Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vineet Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Dinesh Kumar Rakesh Kumar Gupta And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
order dated 27.08.2025 has referred the matter for compromise verification in Application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. No. 7976 of 2022 and in compliance of the aforesaid order, both the parties have appeared before the court below and the compromise deed dated 30.07.2025 has been verified in presence of all concerned parties and the order of verification was passed on 02.09.2025 by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-V, Lucknow. He next added that now the matter has been compromised in between the parties, and as such the proceedings arising out of Case Crime No. 385 of 2019, under Sections 147, 452, 323, 504, 506 of IPC, Police Station-Thakurganj, District -Lucknow, may be quashed. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has also supported the version of the applicants and submits that the parties have entered into compromise deed and now there is no dispute in between the parties and thus the criminal proceeding against the applicant may be dropped. On the other hand, learned AGA appearing for the State has no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I find that compromise has been entered into between the parties on 30.07.2025 and said compromise has been verified on 02.09.2025 and, now, as per the statement of learned counsel for the parties, they do not want to press the aforementioned case, arising out of aforementioned Case Crime No. 385 of 2019. In view of the above, as the applicants and opposite parties have entered into compromise on 30.07.2025 and no grievance remains to be agitated and as such, further criminal proceedings in the aforementioned criminal case are liable to be set aside in view of the Judgements of the Apex Court rendered in B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another (2003)4 SCC 675; Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation[2008)9 SCC 677]; Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303; and Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab ( 2014) 6 SCC
466. Resultantly, the proceedings arising out of Case Crime No.385 of 2019, u/s 147, 452, 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C., Police Station- Thakurganj, District Lucknow, are hereby quashed. The compromise deed shall be part of this order. A482 No. 8010 of 2025 2
Consequences to be followed.
The application is allowed accordingly. September 23, 2025 AKS A482 No. 8010 of 2025 3 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench