HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9027 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Kunwar Ravi Prakash, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Shikhar Anand, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.33 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420, 467,468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., registered at Police Station S.I.T, District Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of F.I.R. lodged on 26.06.2023 by an official of Uttar Pradesh Rajkiya Nirman Nigam Ltd. against 39 accused persons including some supplier firms, which include the applicant's firm M/s. Falak General Order Suppliers, alleging that embezzlement of Rs.17.51 Crores has been committed in construction of Government Allopathic Medical College, Bahraich. It is alleged that the applicant has been paid Rs.1,07,027/- for supplying red sand but, the applicant had not supplied any material. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is an innocent person, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. 5. One of the co-accused persons Piyush Jain, who was also supplier, has been granted anticipatory bail by means of order dated 06.03.2025 passed by a Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 139 of 2025. Several other co-accused persons have also been granted anticipatory bail and copies of their anticipatory bail orders have been annexed with the bail application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kunwar Ravi Prakash, Neeraj Tripathi, Umesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Meraj Ahmad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application and he has submitted that the investigation in the matter is still going on. 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the F.I.R levels similar allegations against numerous suppliers and many suppliers have already been granted anticipatory bail in the present case whereas the applicant has no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 13.08.2025, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9. Let the applicant-Meraj Ahmad be released on bail in aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: - (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. September 19, 2025 Ram. BAIL No. 9027 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench