VIJAY SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/8021/2025 · 2025-09-23
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165481 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165481 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8021 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The instant application has been filed seeking following main relief(s) :-
"For the facts, reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying application, duly supported by an affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the order dated 02.09.2025 Passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate Lucknow in Complaint Case No. 85097/2023, Police Station Aashiyana, District Lucknow by which the Chief Judicial Magistrate Lucknow has rejected the complaint under section 203 of Cr.P.C., in the interest of justice." At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant has stated that present petition may be consigned to record with liberty to the applicant to file the revision before the Session Court, which may be directed to be decided expeditiously. In view of the aforesaid, the present application is consigned to record with the liberty to the applicant to file the revision before the Session Court Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Singh, Raj Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vijay Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
concerned, which shall be decided expeditiously. Office is directed to return certified/original copies of the documents annexed with the application to the learned counsel for the applicant as per rules. September 23, 2025 ML/- A482 No. 8021 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench