YOGENDRA PRATAP SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/8011/2025 · 2025-09-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165475 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165475 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8011 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of B.N.S.S.,2023 has been filed with the prayer to quash the impugned summoning order dated 08/02/2022 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faizabad passed in criminal case no. 698/2022 titled "State versus Ganga Singh and others" as well as quash the charge sheet No. 454/2021 dated 31/12/2021 arising out of Case Crime No. 498/2021 lodged under sections 323/504/506 of I.P.C..Police Station-Raunahi, District- Faizabad/Ayodhya. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and were never involved in committing the offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. He added that due to enmity, their names have been planted in the first information report and thereafter they have been chargesheeted. He next added that due to unavoidable circumstances, they could not appear before the court below. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi, Padum Nath Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Yogendra Pratap Singh And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
parties', it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). Further, the applicants will have an opportunity at the appropriate stage to move an application for discharge taking therein all the pleas factual and legal which may be available to them, in accordance with law.
In case, such an application is moved before the learned trial court, the learned trial court shall dispose of the same by a speaking and reasoned order strictly, in accordance with law. The application is disposed of accordingly. September 19, 2025 AKS A482 No. 8011 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench