HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9295 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner claiming that a lease was executed in favour of the petitioner in respect of a land in question, which is sought to be unauthorisedly occupied by the respondents no. 11 & 12. 3. Considering the fact that the main allegation is sought against the private persons, no writ can be issued. 4. The writ petition is dismissed. 5. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to approach the authorities concerned for redressal of their grievance or take any other action which may be permissible under law. September 22, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vimlesh Kumar Kashyap, Dharmendra Kumar Bhatt Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Vinod Kumar Kashyap .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt.Sectt.Lko. And 11 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench