HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5626 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The core submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in suit pending before the trial court, an application for appointment of receiver came to be rejected. The private respondents preferred a civil revision against the said order, which has been allowed. Learned counsel submits that no notice was issued to the present petitioner nor it was served and the revision has been decided ex parte. It is further urged that even otherwise the revision was not maintainable and had the petitioner been served he would have raised the said objection and as such he has been deprived of an opportunity. From perusal of the extract of the order-sheet, which has been brought on record along-with the supplementary affidavit, it indicates that the revisional court has noticed that on 27.3.2025 he heard learned counsel for the parties. At this stage, a specific query was put to counsel for the petitioner as to the fact that in case he had not appeared before the revisional court and the order-sheet dated 27.3.2025 indicates as such whether he has filed a review, he has answered in negative and thereafter he has submitted that Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohiuddin Khan, Mohd. Yasir, Mohd.Zaid Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : Zubair Ahmad @ Mohd. Jubair .....Petitioner(s) Abdul Lateef .....Respondent(s) he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse as may be available to him under law. The petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. September 22, 2025 kanhaiya A227 No. 5626 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench