Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16546 (JHR)

MEENA DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Acq. App./57/2024 · 2025-09-01

Anil Kumar Choudhary

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:26467] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Acq. Appeal No.57 of 2024 ------ Meena Devi, aged about 47 years, wife of Virendra Prasad Sah, resident of Parsa, P.O. & P.S.- Balbadda, District- Godda; … Appellant Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sangita Devi, wife of Kartik Yadav; 3. Mohan Yadav, son of Temu Yadav; 4. Harihar Yadav, son of Temu Yadav; 5. Dharmendra Yadav, son of Nasib Yadav; 6. Kartik Yadav, son of Dhuran Yadav; 7. Dhananjay Yadav, son of Mantar Yadav; 8. Sahdeo Yadav, son of Dhuran Yadav; 9. Nasib Yadav, son of Dhuran Yadav; 10. Kapil Yadav, son of Dhuran Yadav; 11. Krishnakant Yadav, son of Prabhu Yadav; 12. Niranjan Yadav, son of Prabhu Yadav; 13. Prabhu Yadav, son of Mantar Yadav; All are residents of Mouza- Parsa, P.O. & P.S.- Belbadda, District- Godda; … Respondents ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Appeal : Mr. Vikesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sanket Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Ms. Shweta Singh, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-04 Dated:-01-09-2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this court to withdraw this Acquittal Appeal. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this Acquittal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/