IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7626/2024 Decided on: 19.09.2025 Dharam Parkash …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Ms. Ranjana Pathania, Advocate vice Ms. Archna Dutt, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Naveen Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J The writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive reliefs: - “(i) That the office order dated 14.03.2024 whereby the case of the petitioner for grant of work charge status/regularization has been rejected, may kindly be quashed and set aside. (ii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to grant work charge status/regularization to petitioner by counting daily wage service of the petitioner w.e.f. 1991 for the purpose of pension and pensioanry benefits w.e.f. 01.01.2001. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 iii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to condone the fictional breaks in the year 1991 and 1993 due to which the petitioner has not completed 240 days. (iv) That the respondents may kindly be granted pension and pensionary benefits by granting GPF number to the petitioner in the interest of justice and fair play.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issues involved in this writ petition are no longer res-integra and are squarely covered by the decision rendered in The State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Versus Surajmani & Anr.2 and Reshmo Devi Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.3 Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner would be content, in case, respondents are directed to consider his case for redressing the grievance raised by him in this writ petition, in accordance with law and in terms of above decisions within a time bound schedule. Learned Assistant Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 3. Having regard to above submissions but without examining the merits of the matter, this petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgments and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the 2 Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025, decided alongwith connected civil appeals on 06.02.2025 3 CWP No. 11004/2025 decided a/w connected matters on 10.07.2025 3 date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 19th September, 2025(rohit)