Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16543 (RAJ)

DR. VISHNU KANT SHARMA S/O SACHHIDA NAND SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/6636/2025 · 2025-05-02

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18499] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6636/2025 1. Dr. Vishnu Kant Sharma S/o Sachhida Nand Sharma, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Tiwari Dharm Kanta Ke Samne, Agra Road, Choudhari Colony Dausa, Rajasthan. 2. Dr. Shiv Charan Trivedi S/o Jagdish Prasad Trivedi, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Rastriya Bal Mandir K Pas, Shikshak Colony Gupteshwar Road, Dausa, Rajasthan. 3. Dr. Anil Kumar Gupta S/o Ramoli Ram Gupta, Aged About 59 Years, R/o 56-B Prem Nagar Gurjar Ki Thandi Jaipur Rajasthan. 4. Dr. Banwari Lal Vijay S/o Manohar Lal Vijay, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Dubbi Dausa, Rajasthan. 5. Dr. Lakhan Lal Karigar S/o Dungar Ram Karigar, Aged About 59 Years, R/o B-35 Vijaynagar Vistar Vijaypura Road, Purani Chungi Agra Road, Jamdoli Jaipur Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda (Ayush) Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda And Bhartiya Chikitsa (Ayush) Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Dy. Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda And Bhartiya Chikitsa (Ayush), Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 5. Director Ayurveda, Directorate Of Ayurveda, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishabh Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Samee Khan for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG [2025:RJ-JP:18499] (2 of 2) [CW-6636/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 02/05/2025 The petitioners are working as Ayurveda doctors with the respondent-State. They have filed this writ petition seeking benefit of enhancement of age of superannuation as has been extended confined to the Allopathic doctors. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the retirement age of the Ayurveda doctors has already been extended from 60 years to 62 years and the petitioners would not be retired before attaining the age of 62 years. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays or disposal of this writ petition in terms of assurance extended by the learned counsel for the respondents. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/20