1 2025:CGHC:18262-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1365 of 2025 1 - S.R. Ratnakar S/o Late B.K. Ratnakar, Aged About 64 Years R/o Basant Vihar, Uslapur, P.S. And Tahsil- Sakri, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Malikram Johnson S/o Late Durga Prasad Johnson Aged About 55 Years Govt. Aatmanand Higher Secondary School, Shivrinarayan, P.S. Shivrinarayan, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3 - Yuvraj Singh Thakur S/o Faguram Singh Thakur Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Maha Madwa, Tahsil And District- Mungeli (C.G.) 4 - Hemant Kumar Shrivas S/o Late Ganpati Lal Shrivas Aged About 52 Years R/o B.E.O. Office (Wrongly Mentioned As B.F.O. Office), Pamgarh, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Pamgarh, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 2 - Yuvraj Singh Chandel S/o Chhatrapal Singh Chandel Aged About 18 Years R/o Akaltara, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr.Kamlesh Pandey, Advocate For Respondent No.1/State : Mr.S.S.Baghel, Deputy Government Advocate Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2025.04.24 15:55:03 +0530 2 Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 23.04.2025 1. Proceedings of this matter have been taken through video conferencing. 2. Heard Mr.Kamlesh Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr.S.S.Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate appearing for respondent No.1/State. 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the following prayers :- “I. Allow the petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. filed by the petitioners. II. Set-aside/quash the impugned FIR No.415/2024 dated 12.10.2024 registered at Police Station, Pamgarh, District-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) against the petitioners for the offence punishable under Section 420, 34 of IPC (Annexure P/1). III. Grant any other relief, which may be deemed fit in given facts and circumstances of the case, in favour of petitioners.” 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the present case, charge-sheet has been submitted before the jurisdictional criminal Court and as such, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh challenging the 3 charge-sheet. 5. Permission is granted. 6. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu