HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5725 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Girish Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant states that due to defects in the prayer clause and non-filing of the order sheet of the trial court, he does not want to press the present application and prays for withdrawal of the same with liberty to file afresh after curing the defects. 3. The prayer made is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. 5. Office is directed to return the certified copies of the documents annexed with this application to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining photocopy of the same on record. September 24, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girish Kumar Pandey, Chandrika Rani Upadhyay, Tripuresh Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Arti .....Petitioner(s) Judicial Magistrate Ii Raebareli And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench