JAGDAMBA PRASAD GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/5619/2025 · 2025-09-22
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165414 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165414 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5619 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 and 2.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondent no.3 is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 / The Board of Revenue, Lucknow, U.P. to decide the Revision No.2343 of 2021, (Computerized Case No.R20210531002343) "Sunita Devi vs. Jagdambha Prasad Gupta & others", under Section 333 of U.P. Zamindari Abolition Act, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 / The Board of Revenue, Lucknow, U.P., considers and decides the aforesaid revision in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 / The Board of Revenue, Lucknow, U.P. is directed to decide the Revision No.2343 of 2021, (Computerized Case No.R20210531002343) "Sunita Devi vs. Jagdambha Prasad Gupta & others", under Section 333 of U.P. Zamindari Abolition Act, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjeev Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Jagdamba Prasad Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 22, 2025 KR A227 No. 5619 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench