JAI BHOLE PRANSHU TRADERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/4458/2025 · 2025-02-16
Anjani Kumar Mishra, Jayant Banerji
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16541 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16541 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:22144-DB Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4458 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jai Bhole Pranshu Traders Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Birendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Archit Mandhyan,C.S.C.,Sanjay Kumar Singh Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, counsel appearing for the respondent No. 5 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. Challenge in the writ petition is to the order dated 07.06.2024, whereby apart from imposing penalty, licence granted by Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti has been suspended.
3. Counsel appearing for the respondents has raised a preliminary objection stating that in view of Section 25 of the Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 the order suspending a licence is also appealable.
4. Counsel for the petitioner has not been able to dispute this legal position. He only submits that the order is ex-parte.
5. Since, an order of suspension of licence is appealable under Section 25, we do not consider it a fit case for interference.
6. The writ petition is dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the statutory remedy of appeal.
7. It is also provided that in case appeal under Section 25 is filed by the petitioner within a period of ten days from today, it is expected that the same shall be heard and decided on its merits. Order Date :- 17.2.2025 Kashifa Digitally signed by :- KASHIFA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad