( 2025:JHHC:16590 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5005 of 2025 ------ Samiruddin Ansari @ Samruddin Ansari, aged about 47 years, S/o Abdul Rahman Ansari @ Rahman Minya, R/o Ledatand, Madaidih, P.O. & P.S.-Topchanchi, Dist.-Dhanbad. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, Advocate : Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Bandana Sinha, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 23-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Topchanchi P.S. Case No.50 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 325, 326, 506, 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused person committed murder of the son of the informant namely Ehtesaam. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and are general and omnibus in nature. It is also submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.03.2025 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that keeping in view, the direct allegation against the petitioner of assaulting inter alia the deceased Ehtesaam; besides the two other sons of the informant; there is every chance of the petitioner absconding and tampering with evidence, if released on bail. It is therefore submitted that the petitioner ought not be released on bail. Considering the serious nature of allegation against the petitioner as well as the chance of the petitioner absconding and tampering with evidence, if released on bail, this Court is not inclined to admit the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the above-named petitioner is rejected. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/