Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1654 (UTT)

HINA PARVEEN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

HABC/3/2025 · 2025-03-10

Ashish Naithani, G Narendar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures 2025:UHC:1636-DB COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 10.03.2025 HABC No. 3 OF 2025 Hon'ble G. Narendar, C.J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Mukesh Rawat, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.K. Joshi, learned Brief Holder for the State. 2. The corpus had appeared on the previous date of hearing and had denied knowing the petitioner. 3. Subsequently, Supplementary Affidavit dated 07.03.2025 is filed in the Court, on perusal of which, it is seen that several photographs have been produced and the translation of the Whatsapp Chats is also produced. 4. Be that as it may, the remedy for the petitioner does not lie in a habeas corpus petition. Hence, the instant petition is rejected. 5. It is made clear that rejection of the instant petition will not come in the way of the petitioner seeking remedy elsewhere under the law. (Ashish Naithani, J) (G. Narendar, CJ) 10.03.2025 10.03.2025 Rathour