HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9162 of 2025 AND WRIT - C No. - 9163 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel and Sri Desh Deepak Singh, who has filed Vakalatnamas on behalf of the respondent-Bank in both the writ petitions. 2. Both the writ petitions have been filed by the petitioner challenging the recovery certificate dated 16.06.2025 for recovery an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- from the petitioner. 3. The Counsel for the respondent-Bank states that an amount of Rs.5,96,000/- is due and payable by the petitioner, however, on account of inadvertence, the amount has been wrongly mentioned in the recovery certificate. He states that he may be permitted to withdraw the recovery certificate by moving an appropriate application with liberty to issue fresh recovery certificate. 4. In view of the said statement, the writ petitions are rendered infructuous and are accordingly dismissed as infrcutuous. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nripendra Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Nitin Srivastava Veerendra Kumar .....Petitioner(s) District Collector, Distt. Shrawasti And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) . 5. The respondent-Bank shall take appropriate steps for withdrawing the recovery certificate and the respondent would be at liberty to issue fresh recovery certificate, if so advised. September 25, 2025 akverma WRIC No. 9162 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench