HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10940 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 and Sri Anurag Tripathi, learned counsel, who files Vakalatnama on behalf of respondents no.2 and 3. 2. The petitioner, a contractual worker, is aggrieved by the termination of his services vide order dated 31.08.2019, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the writ petition. 3. The petitioner is also aggrieved by the order dated 30.08.2019, a copy of which is Annexure-2 to the writ petition, whereby it has been indicated that as the project has come to an end consequently the persons who are working on contractual basis along with the petitioner have been relieved. 4. Once the project has already come to an end as specifically indicated in the order impugned as such there cannot be any occasion for the petitioner to have continued. 5. Considering the aforesaid, no case for interference is made out. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. 6. However, it is provided that in case any future projects are launched by the respondents the petitioner may apply and his candidature may be considered in accordance with law. September 17, 2025 A. Katiyar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Bajpai, Sharad Kumar Rao Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Bhupendra Kumar Bajpai (Abdul Moin,J.) Om Prakash .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Parti Bhumi Vikas Vibhag Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench