[2025:RJ-JP:12711] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6371/2018 1. Ram Sharan Yadav Son of Shri Laxmi Narayan Yadav, aged about 40 years, Resident of Village Sorwa, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar Raj. 2. Pappu Lal Jat Son of Shri Kishan Lal Jat, aged about 42 years, Resident of 10-I-7, Patel Nagar, Bhilwara Raj. 3. Richhpal Khinchi Son of Shri Jodhraj Khinchi, aged about 35 years, Resident of Ward No. 05, Link Road, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Sikar Raj. 4. Kaptan Singh Meena Son Of Shri Rajkumar Meena, aged about 30 years, Resident Of Village And Post Katad, Tehsil Hindon City, District Karauli Raj. 5. Sant Lal Bana Son Of Shri Bhagwanaram, aged about 40 years, Resident of Village And Post Rolasar, Tehsil Sardar Shahar, District Churu Raj. 6. Sandeep Kumar Dhatarwal Son Of Shri Ramavtar Singh, aged about 37 years, Resident Of Village And Post Mukundgarh, District Jhunjhunu Raj. 7. Harish Kumar Son Of Shri Banwari Lal Ola, aged about 32 years, Resident Of Kisan Colony, Nawalgarh Road, Sikar Raj. 8. Jeevraj Kaswan Son Of Shri Mamraj Kaswan, aged about 40 years, Resident Of Village Lalasar, Post Bhamashi, District Churu Raj. 9. Sunil Kumar Sain Son Of Shri Lalit Sain, aged about 45 years Resident Of Plot No. 13, Ganesh Colony, Jhotwara, Jaipur Raj. 10. Ram Bharat Chejara Son Of Shri Satya Narayan, aged about 45 years, Resident Of Ward No. 02, Village And Post Mukundgarh, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu Raj. 11. Vinod Chiraniya Son Of Shri Bal Kishan Chiraniya, aged about 36 years, Resident Of Khatu Ki Kui Ke Paas, Ward No. 16, Laxmangarh, District Sikar Raj. 12. Sanjay Kumar Chotiya Son Of Shri Jhabarmal Chotiya, aged about 35 years, Resident Of Mori Gate, Laxmangarh, District Sikar Raj. [2025:RJ-JP:12711] (2 of 3) [CW-6371/2018] 13. Kewal Krishna Son Of Shri Vijay Singh, aged about 39 years Resident Of Ward No. 03, Purani Abadi, District Shri Ganganagar Raj. 14. Somesh Gupta Son Of Shri Shanti Swaroop Gupta, aged about 44 years, Resident Of Ward No. 11, Room No. 05, Purani Abadi, District Shri Ganganagar Raj. 15. Punit Bansal Son Of Shri Ashwani Bansal, aged about 33 years, Resident Of R-05, Anand Vihar, District Shri Gangangar Raj. 16. Vinod Soni Son Of Shri Vilayali Ram Soni, aged about 48 years, Resident Of 230, Indira Colony, Street No. 07, District Ganganagar Raj. 17. Rajendra Shyoran Son Of Shri Nathuram, aged about 39 years, Resident Of Netewala, Ward No. 06, District Shri Ganganagar Raj 18. Vikram Singh Son Of Shri Hanuman Singh, aged about 32 years, Resident Of Karanpura, Post Laddiya, Tehsil And District Churu Raj. 19. Kamal Kumar Joshi Son Of Ramavtar Joshi, aged about 35 years, Resident Of Village And Post Near Shyam Mandir, Narodara Gage, Laxmangarh, Laxmangarh, Sikar Raj. 20. Suresh Kanwar Wife Of Shri Chandrabhan Singh Rathore, aged about 36 years, Resident Of Village Harpalsar, Postg Pulasar, Tehsil Sardar Shahar, District Churu Raj. 21. Mahesh Kumar Son of Shri Kusaram, aged about 34 years, Resident of Pulasar, Post Pulasar, Tehsil Sardar Shahar, District Churu Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Secretaria 2. Project Director, National Rural Health Mission, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : [2025:RJ-JP:12711] (3 of 3) [CW-6371/2018] JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 20/03/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made by the petitioners for issuing direction to the respondents not to terminate or replace their services. 2. Contents of the writ petition indicates that the petitioners were engaged on contract basis on the post of PHC, Asha Supervisor in the year 2009 and a contract agreement was executed. 3. It appears that certain contractual employees went on strike in protest, for which a notice was issued by the Project Director, National Rural Health Mission to Chief Medical and Health Officer of all the Districts to take action against such contractual employees who went on strike. 4. Without any basis, the petitioners have approached this Court under the apprehension that their services would be terminated, while no such order has been placed on record. Therefore, at this premature stage, the petitioners have approached this Court without there being any actual cause of action, hence, this writ petition is dismissed on this count alone. 5. Stay application and all pending application, if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/49