Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16532 (UTT)

ADIL RASHEED v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY PANCHAYAT GOVERNMENT OF DEHRADUN

WPMS/3223/2025 · 2025-12-16

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:11252 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PMS/ 3 2 2 3 / 2 0 2 5 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Mohd Safdar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the respondent. 2. According to petitioner, Pradhan of gram Madhopur Hazratpur has committed irregularities while undertaking development works in the village. He submits that although matter was highlighted before the concerned authorities by making complaint, but no decision is being taken. 3. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief: “Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondents no.1 to3 to take action on the representation of petitioner and conduct on-spot and documentary enquiry of the work done in relation to the budget provided for village sanitation and development works since the beginning of the current village Pradhan's tenure to till date and accordingly the suitable action be taken against erring persons.” 4. Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel appearing for the concerned Gram Pradhan, however, submits that earlier also, enquiry was made twice by DPRO through his subordinate officers and nothing was found against his client. He, however, submits that he has no 2025:UHC:11252 objection if DPRO is asked to look into the matter. 5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with direction to the DPRO to examine petitioner’s complaint (enclosed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition), as per law, within four months from date of presentation of certified copy of this order. 6. It is made clear that other stakeholders shall be given personal hearing while passing any order. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 16.12.2025 Mahinder/ MAHINDER SINGH Digitally signed by MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f031a92d1a18 b08923c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC4626D305B1BC9 EA4BABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2025.12.16 18:41:39 +05'30'