SL. No Dat e Of f ice Not es, r ep or t s, or d er s or p r oceed in g s or d ir ect ion s an d Reg ist r ar ’s or d er w it h Sig n at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS Rev iew Applicat ion ( MCC No. 0 3 of 2 0 2 5 ) Delay Con don at ion Applicat ion ( I A No. 0 4 of 2 0 2 6 ) I n SPA No. 1 4 of 2 0 2 5 Mak h an Man dal .... App lican t Vs. St at e of Ut t ar ak h an d an d Ot h er s ... Respon den t s HON’BLE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J. HON’BLE ASHI SH NAI THANI , J. 1. Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Office has reported deficiency in the court fees. 4. Learned counsel for the Applicant states that the Applicant has already removed the defect and has paid the deficient court fees, but the defect has not been removed. 5. Office is directed to submit a fresh report regarding sufficiency of court fees. 6. List this case whenever this Bench is constituted. ( ASHI SH NAI THANI , J.) ( MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.) 24.04.2026 SB