Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165309 (ALL)

DURVIJAY CHAUDHARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/10899/2025 · 2025-09-17

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10899 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to consider and decide petitioner's representation dated 08.01.2025 under Rule 23 (C) of the U.P. Police Officers of Subordinate Rank (Punishment & Appeal) Rules, 1991 whereby his revision against the punishment order. 3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, the opposite party no.1 i.e. Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Civil Secretariat, Lucknow or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. Petitioner shall annex a copy of representation dated 08.01.2025 alongwith a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. September 17, 2025 Subodh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anupam Shukla, Jay Vardhan Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Durvijay Chaudhari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench