HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11424 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Sri M.P. Raju, learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing at some length, submits that petitioners may be permitted to prefer a representation before the competent authority for ventilation of their grievance and a direction may be issued by this Court for considering and deciding their representation within a fixed time frame. 2. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents does not have any objection, if the aforesaid limited prayer made on behalf of the petitioners is granted by this Court. 3. Accordingly, without entering into merits of the case, this writ petition is finally disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file a representation detailing therein their grievance within a period of 15 days from today and if such representation is filed, the same shall be considered and decided by the competent authority, within a period of one month thereafter, by passing a speaking and reasoned order. September 24, 2025 Shahnaz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : M.P. Raju Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) Geevesh Kumar (Head Constable Pno-112500841) And 9 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench