Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16529 (JHR)

ILTAF MIYAN ALIAS ILTAB MIYAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4878/2025 · 2025-06-23

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:16573] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4878 of 2025 ------ Iltaf Miyan @ Iltab Miyan, aged about 31 years, son of Basruddin Miyan, resident of Village Pindari, P.O. Gopibandh, P.S. Sarath, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-23-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.62 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2)/318(4)/338/336(3)/340(2)/61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B/66C/66D/84C of I.T. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cyber crime. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that only because one mobile phone along with one SIM Card was recovered from the possession of the petitioner, hence, the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is then submitted that there is no money trail involved in this case. Drawing attention of this court towards para-14 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.04.2025 as is evident from para-16 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II-cum-Spl. Judge, Cyber Crime Case, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.62 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/