Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16528 (RAJ)

M C SHRI LAXMI NATH SR SEC SCHOOL v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/6166/2018 · 2025-05-20

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:21201] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6166/2018 Managing Committee, Shri Laxmi Nath Senior Secondary School, Fatehpur Shekhawati, District Sikar Rajasthan. Through Its Secretary. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Principal Secretary, Education Department Secondary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Senior Deputy Principal Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Education Group Iv, Department, Jaipur. 4. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 5. District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Ms. Namita Parihar, Dy. GC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 20/05/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been submitted by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “(I) To quash and set aside the impugned order dated 10.03.2017 of the Respondents and the Respondents may kindly be directed to make payment of the due amount of Rs.1,28,11,974.80 towards unpaid grant in aid to the Petitioner Institution alongwith interest @9% per annum till payment. (II) The action of the Respondents is denying to release the grant in aid may kindly be declared to be illegal and the Respondents may kindly be directed to forthwith release the grant in aid in favour of the Petition Institution. [2025:RJ-JP:21201] (2 of 3) [CW-6166/2018] (III) any other appropriate writ, order(s) or direction(s) which the Hon’ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed n favour of the Petitioner. (IV) Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the humble Petitioner.” 2. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking directions against the respondents for payment of unpaid amount of grant-in-aid along-with interest. 3. This is the second round of litigation with regard to the same prayer. On earlier occasion also, the petitioner approached this Court by way of filing S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7972/2015 and the same was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 30.06.2015 granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the authorities concerned for redressal of its grievance. 4. It appears that pursuant to the aforesaid order passed by this Court, the petitioner approached the respondents by way of filing representation and the same was disposed of by the respondents vide order dated 10.03.2017 indicating therein that by way of filing the said representation a prayer has been made for grant of aid towards payment of arrears of 5th pay commission, payment of amount of 6th pay commission, arrears and leave encashment amount but no document of payment in this regard was submitted before the respondents, hence the respondents were of the view that no such employee is working in the petitioner-institution. 5. The representation of the petitioner has not been rejected rather the same has been disposed of by the respondents stating that the same would be considered at a later stage, in case, the petitioner satisfies the respondents by way of filing/submitting [2025:RJ-JP:21201] (3 of 3) [CW-6166/2018] adequate proof with regard to the payment to its employees and his rightful claim to get aid in this regard. 6. No such orders are required to be passed by this Court. The petitioner would be at liberty to approach the respondents again in light of the directions issued by the respondents while deciding the petitioner’s representation dated 10.03.2017. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. 8. In case, any representation is submitted again, the same would be decided by the respondents strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/125