Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165265 (ALL)

RANJANA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

/9186/2025 · 2025-09-23

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9186 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents, and Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha. 2. This petition has been filed with the following main prayer:- "i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the opposite party No.2 to 6 to demarcate the land of the petitioner which is Gata No.185Min/0.013 Hectare situated at Village Panchayat Sultanpur, Block Harakh, Tehsil Nawabganj, District Barabanki and after demarcation construct the road, in the interest of justice." 3. It is the case of the petitoner that the Gram Panchayat had allotted patta in the year 2008 pertaining to Gata no.185Min./0.013 hectare in Village Panchayat Sultanpur, Block Harakh, Tehsil Nawabganj, District Barabanki. The petitioner made constructions on the said land and some land has been left for portico. The respondent no.6 has passed a resolution for construction of interlocking road on the said land and construction work has been started. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has placed before this Court the instructions sent by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Nawabganj, Barabanki, which are taken on record. In the said instructions, it is stated that Plot no.185, area 0.271 hectare is recorded as Banjar and on the basis of decision taken by the Land Management Committee on 8.11.2008, the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Verma, Pramod Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Ranjana Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Nawabganj has granted approval for residential site on 13.12.2008. Smt. Badka, wife of Shreepal, resident of the same village, has been allotted house on Gata no.185Min./0.013 hectare. The petitioner and other allottees have not constructed any house over the residential site and the land is vacant. On Gata no.183/0.417 hectare, abadi is inhabited and the new interlocking raasta has been made, which was approved earlier. The new interlocking raasta has not been constructed on the allotted site of the petitioner. 5. Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.6, has also submitted that the road is being constructed on Gata no.183 which is recorded in the name of Gaon Sabha. 6. In view of the aforesaid factual aspect, we are of the considered opinion that the petitioner has no case. The writ petition is devoid of merit. It is accordingly dismissed. However, it is open for the petitioner to raise her grievance before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. September 23, 2025 Sachin WRIC No. 9186 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench