VIJAY PAL RAWAT @ VIJAY PAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
NABAIL/1289/2025 · 2025-09-19
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165249 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165249 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1289 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard Shri Riyaz Ahmad, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Mayank Sinha, learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. After arguing the matter at some length, the learned counsel for the applicant has restricted his prayer for giving the applicant an opportunity to file an application for bail before the trial court.
4. In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicant to file an application for grant of bail before the trial court and in case such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51. September 19, 2025 S. Shivhare Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Riyaz Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Vijay Pal Rawat @ Vijay Pal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench