SHIV BAHADUR MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. LAW DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A227/5583/2025 · 2025-09-17
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165231 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165231 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5583 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition as the petitioner has an adequate remedy for filing the revision against the impugned order. He is permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file revision with appropriate pleadings. The petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. In case, if the petitioner moves an application for return of certified copies, the office shall do the needful. September 17, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanandan Kumar Misra, Bina Kumari Bajpai, Divya Malviya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Shiv Bahadur Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Law Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench