Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16523 (HP)

RAJENDER SINGH v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

CWP/9792/2025 · 2025-06-18

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.9792 of 2025 Decided on: 18.06 2025 _________________________________________________________________ Rajender Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Nikhil Katwal, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N,.Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L.N.Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General accepts service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed for grant of following substantive reliefs:- “A) That the respondents may be directed to grant the benefit of revised pay scale of year 05.06.1998 to 31.12.2005 and 01.01.2006 to 31.12.2006 from the date of appointment to the date of regularization of petitioner. B. That the respondents may be further directed to 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes - 2 - calculate the arrears on account of revision alongwith interest @ 12% per annum.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred a representation Annexure P-5 to respondent No.2 for claiming the above reliefs. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be content in case respondent No.2/competent authority is directed to decide the aforesaid representation within a fixed time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner Annexure P-5 in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge June 18, 2025 R.Atal