RAJ KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1301/2025 · 2025-09-22
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165228 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165228 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1301 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Bipin Kumar Rai, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no. 2 is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Vinay Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Bipin Kumar Rai, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and Sri Angad Kumar Vishwakarma, learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 258 of 2025, under Sections 340(2), 336(3), 338, 318(4), 316(2) B.N.S, registered at Police Station- Para, District- Lucknow.
4. After advancing submission at some length, the learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press the instant application and seeks liberty to file an application for bail.
5. In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicant to file an application for grant of bail and in case, such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51. September 22, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinay Kumar, Narendra Pratap Singh, Shrikant Tripathi, Touqeer Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Raj Kumar Mishra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench