Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16522 (KAR)

SMT. NALINI v. SMT. ANITHA

HRRP/15/2020 · 2025-06-02

H P Sandesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18496 HRRP No. 15 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH HOUSE RENT REV. PETITION NO.15 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NALINI W/O RAMDEV LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF 1ST PETITIONER SHRI. K. RAMADEV S/O LATE SHRI KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1482 4TH ‘B’ CROSS, 2ND STAGE WEST OF CHORD ROAD MAHALAKSHMIPURAM LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 086. 2. SHRI. VIVEK R, S/O SHRI. K. RAMADEV AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESIDENT AT NO.5 8TH MAIN ROAD OPP. BYRAPPA ENCLAVE RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU – 560 010. 3. SHRI. VINOD DEV R, S/O SHRI. K RAMADEV AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS RESIDENT AT NO.5, 8TH MAIN ROAD OPP BYRAPPA ENCLAVE RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU-560 010. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18496 HRRP No. 15 of 2020 4. SMT. SHAILA W/O SHRI. JAIPRAKASH D/O M. NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS PRESENTLY RESIDING AT CANADA REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER SHRI. K. RAMADEV S/O LATE SHRI. KRISHNAMURTHY 1ST PETITIONER IN THIS APPEAL AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHANMUKHAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. ANITHA W/O SHRI. PANI, CHAMUNDI AUDIO AND ELECTRONICS OLD NO.5, NEW NO.5/1 2ND MAIN, NOW 5TH MAIN NEAR SUN RAISE CIRCLE OKALIPURAM (SRI RAMPURA) BENGALURU-560 021. 2. SHRI. K. GOVINDARAJU S/O LATE SHRI. M. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS R/O NO.5, 5TH MAIN HANUMANTHPURA SRIRAMPURAM BENGALURU-560 021. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. N.DEVARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R2 VIDE ORDER DATED 29.07.2024 APPEAL AGAINST R1 IS DISMISSED) THIS HRRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 46(1) OF KARNATAKA RENT ACT, 1999 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.11.2018 PASSED IN HRC No.56/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18496 HRRP No. 15 of 2020 CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, STOPPING THE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN THE PRESENT CASE ACTING UNDER SECTION 43 OF THE KARNATAKA RENT ACT, 1999. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER This matter is listed for non-compliance of office objections on three occasions. Inspite of granting opportunity on three occasions to comply with the office objections raised on I.A.No.1/2024 i.e., on 12.11.2024, 21.11.2024 and 19.12.2024, office objections are not complied. Further, even though the delay in filing this revision petition was condoned on cost of Rs.500/-, cost is also not paid and not pursuing the matter diligently. Hence, it appears that the revision petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. Accordingly, the HRRP is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and non-payment of cost. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1